Skip to main content

Agile Training, Revisited








“No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man.”
– attributed to Heraclitus

What happens when we come back to Agile training?

As part of our commitment to being an Agile organization and supporting the growth of our people, in 2016 we held 2-day training events for our team members. The training was CSM (Certified ScrumMaster) specific – but we felt it would be valuable for everyone, not just those people whose role included Scrum Master. We achieved almost 100% – as in, almost everyone in the company attended, and almost all of those took and passed the CSM. More importantly, with senior management and business leaders attending alongside engineers, the training created conversations and shared understanding that helped us make significant strides in our ability to succeed and deliver value using agile mindset and principles.

Two years later, a lot has changed. Our business has shifted. One of our product lines has enough teams on it that we have crossed the scaling threshold, where cross-team coordination becomes more and more important. We’ve become a small part of a much larger company, but still have our own business, culture, and identity. A few people have moved on. We’ve grown and hired many more people… only a few of which have had prior agile experience.

In that context we set up a new round of agile training: a 2-day workshop for engineers who either missed the last training or have joined the company since that time. We worked with an experienced Agilist and trainer (Barry Schwartze) from one of our sister companies to design the training, and I attended as co-facilitator and link to our company’s context. We were not specifically going for CSM this time, but for learning that would help baseline team members with shared context and knowledge.

So, what happened…?

Experience, Conversation, and Energy

Our workshop attendees in this round had been with the company – and already working on our agile teams – for periods spanning one week up to two years (not counting the one senior team member who missed the prior trainings.) The experiential exercises coupled with underlying motivations (the “why” of Agile) created new understanding and enabled team members to link “what” is happening on their teams with the underlying purposes. Much questioning and conversation occurred as participants connected the training material (and Barry’s experience across multiple companies) with what was happening on their teams. With a clearer vision of what “better” could look like, many participants left with both ideas for improvement on their teams as well as the energy to pursue that improvement with their teams. Seeing the energy coming out of the workshop, I let our Product Owners and Scrum Masters know to expect and welcome this potential for new improvements.

For my own part, I’m eager and excited to see how this will play out across the teams. So far I am seeing team members lobby for improvements, and several team members have stepped forward with an interest in serving as Scrum Masters. In the future, I expect to look back at this round of training as a catalyst that pushed us further in our ability to succeed and deliver value.

Originally published July 12th, 2018 on the Innovative Software Engineering blog. Republished with permission.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The (Invisible?) Influence of Structures

When I walked into the room, I noticed the haphazard arrangement… 3 short rows of 4 chairs each here… a circle of chairs over there… a couple of comfy couches and chairs surrounding a coffee table in that corner… 4 chairs around a small table… and some chairs in random locations, as if shaken up like a cupful of dice and somehow landing on their feet. I sat in the front of the 3 short rows. Other people were arriving, sitting down in various places in the room. We were waiting for the session to begin. After a while, something entered my awareness… at the circle of chairs, there was a lively conversation. At the comfy couches, there was a lively conversation. At the chairs around a table, there was a lively conversation. But in the rows of chairs… we had greeted each other as we sat down, but we were not now engaged in conversation. I turned to the people near me in the rows, pointed out what was going on in the other circles, and suggested that we turn our chairs into a circle. Lively

Lessons from the fragile

What's the opposite of fragile?   Most people's immediate answer is "robust" or "resilient". But consider… if we subject something that is fragile to stress, shock, randomness or volatility, we can expect that it will be harmed. If we do the same to something that is robust or resilient, we can expect that it will resist harm - but won't be any better off than when we started. But what if something that is subjected to stress, shock, randomness or volatility actually benefited ? That would be the opposite of fragile: antifragile. This is the core theme of Nassim Nicholas Taleb's book Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder .   What does fragility and antifragility look like?   As human beings, we often think of things that have uncertainty or randomness as having a range of possible outcomes that are centered around some "most likely" outcome, as in the diagram below.     However in many domains, there is an asymmetr